Tense and Aspect

(This is a work in progress)

If we look at “time” as a uni­ver­sal con­cept, we notice that most lan­gua­ges divide “time” into three major cate­go­ries: past, pre­sent and future. In gram­ma­ti­cal terms, “tense” refers to the inter­ac­tion of actual “time” with the form of a verb.

Aspect descri­bes whe­ther an action is com­ple­ted or in pro­gress (incomplete).

Verbs and the progressive

The pro­gres­sive can only be used with “action” (dyna­mic) verbs. Sta­tive verbs can­not be used in the pro­gres­sive. For a list of sta­tive verbs see a good gram­mar book.

Pre­sent

The pre­sent is a strange place because, when we think about it, the ques­tion where the pre­sent is beco­mes kind of pro­ble­ma­tic. The “now” is always over as soon as we talk about it. So we could debate whe­ther a “pre­sent” actually exists. The pre­sent is more or less stuck in  limbo bet­ween the past and the future. But nonethe­l­ess, it is an import­ant tense because it also sepa­ra­tes the past from the future.

Three basic types of Pre­sent can be distinguished:

  1. “unbound” time, sta­tive, fac­tual state­ments, hab­itual action: Sim­ple Pre­sent
    Exam­ples:
    - I always write with a pen because my hand­wri­t­ing looks hor­ri­ble other­wise.
    - The moon goes around the earth.

    - The bus stops at Leonard’s Cor­ner.
  2. action in pro­gress, i.e. limited to a cer­tain time: Pre­sent Pro­gres­sive
    Exam­ples:
    - I’m wri­t­ing with a biro because I can’t find my beloved pen! (Damn you, pen, where are you?)
    - He’s having a party, that’s why it’s so loud. (That damn sound is com­ing from ups­tairs)
    - The bus is stop­ping. (it’s stop­ping really slow)
    The Pre­sent Pro­gres­sive is also used when some­thing is hap­pe­ning a bit _too_ often (it’s annoy­ing):
    - I’m always mis­pla­c­ing my pen.
  3. an action “bound” to a par­ti­cu­lar time, but too fast to be descri­bed as “in pro­gress”: Sim­ple Pre­sent
    Exam­ples:
    - Smith pas­ses to Jack­son, Jack­son pas­ses to Smith, John­son… (foot­ball com­men­tary)
    - Take 100 gram of sugar, mix it with the but­ter… (giving direc­tions)

Past

An action in the past can be

1. at a par­ti­cu­lar point in time: Sim­ple Past
     I wrote with a pen yes­ter­day. (Yay!)

2. over a period of time:
            — going up the the pre­sent: Pre­sent Per­fect
                I have writ­ten with pens since 1980.
            — is rela­ted to the past:
                             — is com­plete: Sim­ple Past
                                I wrote with a biro on occa­sion bet­ween 1981 and 1983.
                             — is in pro­gress at/around a cer­tain time in the past: Past Pro­gres­sive
                                I was wri­t­ing with a pen when you called.

The past can also be expres­sed with the so-called “his­to­ric pre­sent”.
For hab­itual activity, “used to” seems to be the bet­ter choice: He always wrote with a pen. / He used to write with a pen.

Past vs. Perfect

Let’s have a look at the fol­lo­wing sen­tence again:

I have writ­ten with pens since 1980.

The Pre­sent Per­fect used here indi­ca­tes that I still write with pens. The Per­fect has a close link to the “now” (that is why it is cal­led PRESENT Per­fect, and that is why I use the time indi­ca­tor “since”).

Com­pare:

a. Alec Guin­ness star­red in many movies.

b. Har­ri­son Ford has star­red in many movies.

c. Har­ri­son Ford star­red in many movies in the 1980s.

Sen­tence a is writ­ten in the Sim­ple Past; Alec Guin­ness is dead. He had the main part in many movies, but not any more (cle­arly). So there can­not be any con­nec­tion with the “now” unless… well. It’s impos­si­ble. Sen­tence b, howe­ver, is in the Pre­sent Per­fect because Har­ri­son Ford is alive and well, and he will pro­bably make more movies in the future (this is the usual inter­pre­ta­tion, it could also refer to an unspe­ci­fied date in the past, but we just pre­tend that this is impos­si­ble). Sen­tence c – Har­ri­son Ford is nonethe­l­ess alive – gives a par­ti­cu­lar time frame in the past, so a Past tense has to be used.

Since the Per­fect has a con­nec­tion with the pre­sent, it is used in con­junc­tion with cer­tain time adverbs that refer to a period of time begin­ning in the past and going up to the pre­sent: since, for, lately, alre­ady, this year/month, yet, never, etc..

The Pre­sent Per­fect is also used to intro­duce a new topic (because its time frame can be inde­fi­nite). After the intro­duc­tion, though, a “defi­nite” story con­ti­nues in a clear Past tense:

Ger­many has won the world cham­pi­onship! They played against Eng­land yesterday…

Past Per­fect

Let’s have a look at the fol­lo­wing “time map”:

time

What we said before regar­ding the Pre­sent Per­fect (that it stret­ches up to the pre­sent), applies also to the Past Per­fect — apart from the fact that the Pre­sent Per­fect extends up to the pre­sent (big arrow), whe­reas the Past Per­fect stret­ches up to a point of rele­vance in the past (small arrow):

When I met Peter the other night, I had known him for 5 years.

The Past and the Progressive

The pro­gres­sive is used when the action is “in pro­gress” (i.e., “incom­plete”). So it does not mat­ter whe­ther this “in pro­gress” refers to now, the future or the past: If you under­s­tood the use of the pro­gres­sive aspect for one tense, you know it for all tenses:

a. When I was wal­king home the other night, I met Peter. = incom­plete action in the past

b. I have been pain­ting the room since 7. = incom­plete action with a link to the pre­sent (since 7), so I’m still on it (or I may have finis­hed just now)

c. I had been pain­ting the room since 7 when you cal­led last night. = incom­plete action in the past which star­ted before a refe­rence point in the past (you cal­led) and may con­ti­nue beyond this point.

The pro­gres­sive is very con­ve­ni­ent to indi­cate that some­thing is not finis­hed or is going on around some time in the past (the pre­sent, the future). Other lan­gua­ges, such as Ger­man, have to para­phrase some­thing that is unfi­nis­hed or in progress.

He wrote a let­ter last night. = he finis­hed it. Ger­man: Er schrieb ges­tern Abend einen Brief.
He was wri­t­ing a let­ter last night. = he star­ted a let­ter, but did not finish it. Ger­man: Er fing ges­tern Abend an, einen Brief zu schreiben.

 

to be continued…